refactor: revert CI image approach and use standard npm ci in workflows
Test / unit-tests (push) Successful in 2m32s
Pull Request / unit-tests (pull_request) Successful in 2m36s
Pull Request / acceptance-tests (pull_request) Failing after 4m59s
Pull Request / analyze-bump-type (pull_request) Has been skipped

The CI image approach with pre-installed dependencies doesn't work with Gitea Actions due to workspace mounting issues. When Gitea Actions runs a container job, it mounts the workspace at a specific path (e.g., /workspace/david/euchre_camp), which hides the container's /app directory where dependencies were installed.

Changes:
- Reverted pr.yml unit-tests to use node:20-alpine with npm ci
- Updated pr.yml acceptance-tests to use mcr.microsoft.com/playwright image with npm ci
- Updated test.yml to use node:20-alpine with npm ci
- Removed ci-image-builder.yml workflow
- Removed Dockerfile.ci and build-ci-image.sh
- Updated AGENTS.md and README.md to document the deprecation
- Updated justfile to remove CI image commands

The standard approach of running npm ci in each workflow is the recommended approach for Gitea Actions.
This commit is contained in:
2026-03-31 23:10:50 -07:00
parent 397594a9df
commit d24e810ad1
8 changed files with 53 additions and 240 deletions
+17 -14
View File
@@ -129,23 +129,26 @@ DATABASE_PROVIDER=sqlite DATABASE_URL=file:./prisma/ci.db npm run test:acceptanc
### CI Runner Image
To speed up CI runs, the project uses a pre-built CI runner image with all dependencies pre-installed.
**Note:** The CI runner image approach has been deprecated for Gitea Actions workflows.
**Building the CI image locally:**
```bash
./scripts/build-ci-image.sh [tag]
```
The original attempt to use a pre-built CI runner image with pre-installed dependencies encountered fundamental issues with how Gitea Actions handles workspace mounting. When Gitea Actions runs a container job, it mounts the workspace at a specific path (e.g., `/workspace/david/euchre_camp`), which hides the container's `/app` directory where dependencies were installed.
**Using the CI image:**
- Workflows automatically use `ghcr.io/<repo>/ci-runner:latest` when available
- Falls back to `node:20-alpine` if image is not found
- Image is automatically rebuilt when `package.json` changes
**Current Approach:**
- Workflows use standard `node:20-alpine` or `mcr.microsoft.com/playwright` containers
- Dependencies are installed via `npm ci` in each workflow run
- This is the recommended approach for Gitea Actions
**CI Image contains:**
- Node.js 20 Alpine
- All npm dependencies pre-installed
- Prisma client pre-generated
- System tools (bash, git, python, make, g++)
**Why the CI image approach doesn't work:**
1. Dockerfile.ci installs dependencies in `/app`
2. Gitea Actions mounts workspace at `/workspace/david/euchre_camp`
3. Workspace mount hides the `/app` directory
4. Symlinks from `/app/node_modules` don't work because `/app` is hidden
**Alternative for performance:**
If CI performance becomes an issue, consider:
- Using GitHub Actions cache for node_modules
- Using a self-hosted runner with persistent workspace
- Using the main Dockerfile's `test-runner` target for release workflows (which works because it builds a complete image)
### CI/CD Pipeline
The project uses Gitea Actions for continuous integration: